Review



anti irf3 rabbit polyclonal antibody  (Proteintech)


Bioz Verified Symbol Proteintech is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 96
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Proteintech anti irf3 rabbit polyclonal antibody
    Anti Irf3 Rabbit Polyclonal Antibody, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 437 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti irf3 rabbit polyclonal antibody/product/Proteintech
    Average 96 stars, based on 437 article reviews
    anti irf3 rabbit polyclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    96/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    anti irf3 rabbit polyclonal antibody  (Proteintech)
    96
    Proteintech anti irf3 rabbit polyclonal antibody
    Anti Irf3 Rabbit Polyclonal Antibody, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti irf3 rabbit polyclonal antibody/product/Proteintech
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti irf3 rabbit polyclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    96/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    rabbit polyclonal anti human irf3 antibody  (Proteintech)
    96
    Proteintech rabbit polyclonal anti human irf3 antibody
    (A) Immunohistochemical staining of γH2AX, cGAS, STING, <t>IRF3,</t> and IFN-α was evaluated across multiple TMA slides and categorized as weak (1+), moderate (2+), or strong (3+). (B) Distribution of H-scores for each antibody across 164 cases. H-scores were categorized into two groups: Weak (0–150), Moderate to high (151–300). The Mann–Whitney U test was performed to compare two groups, *p < 0.001. Represents images acquired at 20 × magnification.
    Rabbit Polyclonal Anti Human Irf3 Antibody, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit polyclonal anti human irf3 antibody/product/Proteintech
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit polyclonal anti human irf3 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    96/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    rabbit polyclonal anti irf3 antibody  (Proteintech)
    96
    Proteintech rabbit polyclonal anti irf3 antibody
    (A) Immunohistochemical staining of γH2AX, cGAS, STING, <t>IRF3,</t> and IFN-α was evaluated across multiple TMA slides and categorized as weak (1+), moderate (2+), or strong (3+). (B) Distribution of H-scores for each antibody across 164 cases. H-scores were categorized into two groups: Weak (0–150), Moderate to high (151–300). The Mann–Whitney U test was performed to compare two groups, *p < 0.001. Represents images acquired at 20 × magnification.
    Rabbit Polyclonal Anti Irf3 Antibody, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit polyclonal anti irf3 antibody/product/Proteintech
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit polyclonal anti irf3 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    96/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    anti irf3 rabbit polyclonal  (Bio-Rad)
    85
    Bio-Rad anti irf3 rabbit polyclonal
    (A) Immunohistochemical staining of γH2AX, cGAS, STING, <t>IRF3,</t> and IFN-α was evaluated across multiple TMA slides and categorized as weak (1+), moderate (2+), or strong (3+). (B) Distribution of H-scores for each antibody across 164 cases. H-scores were categorized into two groups: Weak (0–150), Moderate to high (151–300). The Mann–Whitney U test was performed to compare two groups, *p < 0.001. Represents images acquired at 20 × magnification.
    Anti Irf3 Rabbit Polyclonal, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 85/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti irf3 rabbit polyclonal/product/Bio-Rad
    Average 85 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti irf3 rabbit polyclonal - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    85/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    anti irf3 rabbit polyclonal  (Proteintech)
    96
    Proteintech anti irf3 rabbit polyclonal
    (A) Immunohistochemical staining of γH2AX, cGAS, STING, <t>IRF3,</t> and IFN-α was evaluated across multiple TMA slides and categorized as weak (1+), moderate (2+), or strong (3+). (B) Distribution of H-scores for each antibody across 164 cases. H-scores were categorized into two groups: Weak (0–150), Moderate to high (151–300). The Mann–Whitney U test was performed to compare two groups, *p < 0.001. Represents images acquired at 20 × magnification.
    Anti Irf3 Rabbit Polyclonal, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti irf3 rabbit polyclonal/product/Proteintech
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti irf3 rabbit polyclonal - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    96/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    polyclonal rabbit anti irf7  (Boster Bio)
    94
    Boster Bio polyclonal rabbit anti irf7
    (A) Immunohistochemical staining of γH2AX, cGAS, STING, <t>IRF3,</t> and IFN-α was evaluated across multiple TMA slides and categorized as weak (1+), moderate (2+), or strong (3+). (B) Distribution of H-scores for each antibody across 164 cases. H-scores were categorized into two groups: Weak (0–150), Moderate to high (151–300). The Mann–Whitney U test was performed to compare two groups, *p < 0.001. Represents images acquired at 20 × magnification.
    Polyclonal Rabbit Anti Irf7, supplied by Boster Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/polyclonal rabbit anti irf7/product/Boster Bio
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    polyclonal rabbit anti irf7 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    94/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    rabbit anti p irf3 ser396 polyclonal antibody  (Proteintech)
    96
    Proteintech rabbit anti p irf3 ser396 polyclonal antibody
    (A) Immunohistochemical staining of γH2AX, cGAS, STING, <t>IRF3,</t> and IFN-α was evaluated across multiple TMA slides and categorized as weak (1+), moderate (2+), or strong (3+). (B) Distribution of H-scores for each antibody across 164 cases. H-scores were categorized into two groups: Weak (0–150), Moderate to high (151–300). The Mann–Whitney U test was performed to compare two groups, *p < 0.001. Represents images acquired at 20 × magnification.
    Rabbit Anti P Irf3 Ser396 Polyclonal Antibody, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti p irf3 ser396 polyclonal antibody/product/Proteintech
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti p irf3 ser396 polyclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    96/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    rabbit anti irf3 polyclonal antibody  (Proteintech)
    96
    Proteintech rabbit anti irf3 polyclonal antibody
    IRF1 interacts with <t>IRF3</t> and promotes IRF3 recruitment to ISG promoters . (A) THP-1 cells transduced with control sgRNA (Ctrl) or sgRNA targeting IRF1 were mock-infected or infected with HSV-1 (MOI = 5), and WCLs were analyzed by immunoblotting at 8 h post-infection. (B) THP-1 cells were mock-infected or infected with HSV-1 (MOI = 5), and nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions were isolated at the indicated time points and analyzed by immunoblotting. (C) HEK293T cells were transfected with the indicated plasmids, and WCLs were collected for immunoprecipitation with anti-FLAG affinity agarose. The input and precipitated samples were analyzed by immunoblotting. (D) HT1080 cells were infected with HSV-1 (MOI = 10) for 8 h. Co-immunoprecipitation was performed with the indicated antibodies, followed by immunoblotting analysis. (E) THP-1 cells transduced with control sgRNA (Ctrl) or sgRNA targeting IRF1 were mock-infected or infected with HSV-1 (MOI = 10), and nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions were isolated at 8 h post-infection and analyzed by immunoblotting. (F) THP-1 cells were mock-infected or infected with HSV-1 (MOI = 10) for 5 or 10 h. Cell lysates were collected and pulldown assays were performed using a biotin-labeled ISG54 ISRE probe. The input and probe-bound proteins were analyzed with the indicated antibodies. (G) THP-1 cells transduced with control sgRNA (Ctrl) or sgRNA targeting IRF1 were mock-infected or infected with HSV-1 (MOI = 10) for 8 h. Cell lysates were collected and pulldown assays were performed using a biotin-labeled ISG54 ISRE probe. The input and probe-bound proteins were analyzed using <t>an</t> <t>anti-IRF3</t> <t>polyclonal</t> antibody, and the input samples were also analyzed using an anti-IRF1 monoclonal antibody. (H) THP-1 cells transduced with control sgRNA (Ctrl) or sgRNA targeting IRF1 were infected with HSV-1 (MOI = 10) for 10 h, followed by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) using an anti-IRF3 antibody or control IgG. IRF3 occupancy at the IFNB1 and IFNL1 promoter regions was assessed by qPCR.
    Rabbit Anti Irf3 Polyclonal Antibody, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti irf3 polyclonal antibody/product/Proteintech
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti irf3 polyclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    96/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    (A) Immunohistochemical staining of γH2AX, cGAS, STING, IRF3, and IFN-α was evaluated across multiple TMA slides and categorized as weak (1+), moderate (2+), or strong (3+). (B) Distribution of H-scores for each antibody across 164 cases. H-scores were categorized into two groups: Weak (0–150), Moderate to high (151–300). The Mann–Whitney U test was performed to compare two groups, *p < 0.001. Represents images acquired at 20 × magnification.

    Journal: PLOS One

    Article Title: Prognostic value of cGAS-STING-IRF3 signaling in cholangiocarcinoma patients

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0342756

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Immunohistochemical staining of γH2AX, cGAS, STING, IRF3, and IFN-α was evaluated across multiple TMA slides and categorized as weak (1+), moderate (2+), or strong (3+). (B) Distribution of H-scores for each antibody across 164 cases. H-scores were categorized into two groups: Weak (0–150), Moderate to high (151–300). The Mann–Whitney U test was performed to compare two groups, *p < 0.001. Represents images acquired at 20 × magnification.

    Article Snippet: Primary antibodies used included a rabbit polyclonal Gamma H2A.X antibody (phosphor S139) (γH2AFX; dilution 1:400, ab11174; Abcam), rabbit polyclonal anti-human c-GAS antibody (dilution 1:200, Proteintech, US), rabbit polyclonal anti-human STING antibody (dilution 1:3000, Proteintech, US), rabbit polyclonal anti-human IRF3 antibody (dilution 1:800, Proteintech, US), and rabbit polyclonal anti-human IFN alpha antibody (dilution 1:50, Proteintech, US).

    Techniques: Immunohistochemical staining, Staining, MANN-WHITNEY

    A . (A-C) FFPE from a CCA patients of H&E staining, 20X, scale bar = 100 µm of Well, Moderate and Poorly differentiated papillary subtype. (D-F) Weak (1+), Moderate (2+), or Strong (3+) of IRF3 expression patterns. Represents staining, 20X, scale bar = 100 µm. B . (A-C) FFPE from a CCA patients of H&E staining, 20X, scale bar = 100 µm of Well, Moderate and Poorly differentiated tubular subtype. (D-F) Weak (1+), Moderate (2+), or Strong (3+) of IRF3 expression patterns. Represents staining, 20X, scale bar = 100 µm.

    Journal: PLOS One

    Article Title: Prognostic value of cGAS-STING-IRF3 signaling in cholangiocarcinoma patients

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0342756

    Figure Lengend Snippet: A . (A-C) FFPE from a CCA patients of H&E staining, 20X, scale bar = 100 µm of Well, Moderate and Poorly differentiated papillary subtype. (D-F) Weak (1+), Moderate (2+), or Strong (3+) of IRF3 expression patterns. Represents staining, 20X, scale bar = 100 µm. B . (A-C) FFPE from a CCA patients of H&E staining, 20X, scale bar = 100 µm of Well, Moderate and Poorly differentiated tubular subtype. (D-F) Weak (1+), Moderate (2+), or Strong (3+) of IRF3 expression patterns. Represents staining, 20X, scale bar = 100 µm.

    Article Snippet: Primary antibodies used included a rabbit polyclonal Gamma H2A.X antibody (phosphor S139) (γH2AFX; dilution 1:400, ab11174; Abcam), rabbit polyclonal anti-human c-GAS antibody (dilution 1:200, Proteintech, US), rabbit polyclonal anti-human STING antibody (dilution 1:3000, Proteintech, US), rabbit polyclonal anti-human IRF3 antibody (dilution 1:800, Proteintech, US), and rabbit polyclonal anti-human IFN alpha antibody (dilution 1:50, Proteintech, US).

    Techniques: Staining, Expressing

    (A–E) Kaplan–Meier survival curves comparing patients with low and moderate-to-high expression of γH2AX, cGAS, STING, IRF3, and IFN-α. P-values were calculated using the log-rank test.

    Journal: PLOS One

    Article Title: Prognostic value of cGAS-STING-IRF3 signaling in cholangiocarcinoma patients

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0342756

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A–E) Kaplan–Meier survival curves comparing patients with low and moderate-to-high expression of γH2AX, cGAS, STING, IRF3, and IFN-α. P-values were calculated using the log-rank test.

    Article Snippet: Primary antibodies used included a rabbit polyclonal Gamma H2A.X antibody (phosphor S139) (γH2AFX; dilution 1:400, ab11174; Abcam), rabbit polyclonal anti-human c-GAS antibody (dilution 1:200, Proteintech, US), rabbit polyclonal anti-human STING antibody (dilution 1:3000, Proteintech, US), rabbit polyclonal anti-human IRF3 antibody (dilution 1:800, Proteintech, US), and rabbit polyclonal anti-human IFN alpha antibody (dilution 1:50, Proteintech, US).

    Techniques: Expressing

    IRF1 interacts with IRF3 and promotes IRF3 recruitment to ISG promoters . (A) THP-1 cells transduced with control sgRNA (Ctrl) or sgRNA targeting IRF1 were mock-infected or infected with HSV-1 (MOI = 5), and WCLs were analyzed by immunoblotting at 8 h post-infection. (B) THP-1 cells were mock-infected or infected with HSV-1 (MOI = 5), and nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions were isolated at the indicated time points and analyzed by immunoblotting. (C) HEK293T cells were transfected with the indicated plasmids, and WCLs were collected for immunoprecipitation with anti-FLAG affinity agarose. The input and precipitated samples were analyzed by immunoblotting. (D) HT1080 cells were infected with HSV-1 (MOI = 10) for 8 h. Co-immunoprecipitation was performed with the indicated antibodies, followed by immunoblotting analysis. (E) THP-1 cells transduced with control sgRNA (Ctrl) or sgRNA targeting IRF1 were mock-infected or infected with HSV-1 (MOI = 10), and nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions were isolated at 8 h post-infection and analyzed by immunoblotting. (F) THP-1 cells were mock-infected or infected with HSV-1 (MOI = 10) for 5 or 10 h. Cell lysates were collected and pulldown assays were performed using a biotin-labeled ISG54 ISRE probe. The input and probe-bound proteins were analyzed with the indicated antibodies. (G) THP-1 cells transduced with control sgRNA (Ctrl) or sgRNA targeting IRF1 were mock-infected or infected with HSV-1 (MOI = 10) for 8 h. Cell lysates were collected and pulldown assays were performed using a biotin-labeled ISG54 ISRE probe. The input and probe-bound proteins were analyzed using an anti-IRF3 polyclonal antibody, and the input samples were also analyzed using an anti-IRF1 monoclonal antibody. (H) THP-1 cells transduced with control sgRNA (Ctrl) or sgRNA targeting IRF1 were infected with HSV-1 (MOI = 10) for 10 h, followed by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) using an anti-IRF3 antibody or control IgG. IRF3 occupancy at the IFNB1 and IFNL1 promoter regions was assessed by qPCR.

    Journal: Cell Insight

    Article Title: IRF1 amplifies HSV-1-triggered antiviral innate immunity in a feed-forward manner

    doi: 10.1016/j.cellin.2025.100255

    Figure Lengend Snippet: IRF1 interacts with IRF3 and promotes IRF3 recruitment to ISG promoters . (A) THP-1 cells transduced with control sgRNA (Ctrl) or sgRNA targeting IRF1 were mock-infected or infected with HSV-1 (MOI = 5), and WCLs were analyzed by immunoblotting at 8 h post-infection. (B) THP-1 cells were mock-infected or infected with HSV-1 (MOI = 5), and nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions were isolated at the indicated time points and analyzed by immunoblotting. (C) HEK293T cells were transfected with the indicated plasmids, and WCLs were collected for immunoprecipitation with anti-FLAG affinity agarose. The input and precipitated samples were analyzed by immunoblotting. (D) HT1080 cells were infected with HSV-1 (MOI = 10) for 8 h. Co-immunoprecipitation was performed with the indicated antibodies, followed by immunoblotting analysis. (E) THP-1 cells transduced with control sgRNA (Ctrl) or sgRNA targeting IRF1 were mock-infected or infected with HSV-1 (MOI = 10), and nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions were isolated at 8 h post-infection and analyzed by immunoblotting. (F) THP-1 cells were mock-infected or infected with HSV-1 (MOI = 10) for 5 or 10 h. Cell lysates were collected and pulldown assays were performed using a biotin-labeled ISG54 ISRE probe. The input and probe-bound proteins were analyzed with the indicated antibodies. (G) THP-1 cells transduced with control sgRNA (Ctrl) or sgRNA targeting IRF1 were mock-infected or infected with HSV-1 (MOI = 10) for 8 h. Cell lysates were collected and pulldown assays were performed using a biotin-labeled ISG54 ISRE probe. The input and probe-bound proteins were analyzed using an anti-IRF3 polyclonal antibody, and the input samples were also analyzed using an anti-IRF1 monoclonal antibody. (H) THP-1 cells transduced with control sgRNA (Ctrl) or sgRNA targeting IRF1 were infected with HSV-1 (MOI = 10) for 10 h, followed by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) using an anti-IRF3 antibody or control IgG. IRF3 occupancy at the IFNB1 and IFNL1 promoter regions was assessed by qPCR.

    Article Snippet: The following antibodies and reagents were used for immunoblotting and immunoprecipitation: Mouse anti-FLAG monoclonal antibody (1:10,000, Dia-An Biotechnology, catalog no. 2064); Mouse anti-HA monoclonal antibody (1:5000, Dia-An Biotechnology, catalog no. 2063); Mouse anti-β-actin monoclonal antibody (1:5000, Dia-An Biotechnology, catalog no. 2060); Mouse anti-GAPDH monoclonal antibody (1:1000, Santa Cruz, sc-47724); Histone H3 antibody (1:1000, Santa Cruz, sc-517576); Rabbit anti-MITA/STING polyclonal antibody (1:5000, Proteintech, catalog no. 19851-1-AP); Rabbit anti-IRF3 polyclonal antibody (1:1000, Proteintech, catalog no. 11312-1-AP); Rabbit anti-TBK1 monoclonal antibody (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, catalog no. 3504); Rabbit anti-phospho-IRF3 (S386) monoclonal antibody (1:1000, Abcam, AB76493); Rabbit anti-phospho-TBK1 (S172) monoclonal antibody (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, catalog no. 5483); Rabbit anti-IRF1 monoclonal antibody (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, catalog no. 8478); Rabbit IgG (Proteintech, catalog no. 20010049); Mouse anti-ICP0 monoclonal antibody (1:1000, Santa Cruz, sc-53070); Mouse anti-ICP8 monoclonal antibody (1:1000, Santa Cruz, sc-53329); Mouse anti-ICP27 monoclonal antibody (1:1000, Santa Cruz, sc-69806); Mouse anti-ICP5 monoclonal antibody (1:1000, Santa Cruz, sc-56989); IRDye 800CW Goat anti-Rabbit and Goat anti-Mouse secondary antibodies (1:10,000, LI-COR); Anti-FLAG beads (Dia-An Biotechnology); Protein A/G agarose (GE healthcare).

    Techniques: Transduction, Control, Infection, Western Blot, Isolation, Transfection, Immunoprecipitation, Labeling, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation

    IRF1 promotes antiviral innate immunity through its DNA-binding activity . (A) HEK293T cells were transfected with the indicated plasmids, and WCLs were collected for immunoprecipitation with anti-FLAG affinity agarose. The input and immunoprecipitated samples were analyzed by immunoblotting. (B–E) THP-1 cells stably expressing vector control, IRF1-WT, or IRF1-R82A were mock-infected or infected with HSV-1 (MOI = 5). The indicated genes were quantified by RT-qPCR (B–D), and WCLs were analyzed by immunoblotting at 8 h post-infection (E). (F) THP-1 cells stably expressing vector control, IRF1-WT, or IRF1-R82A were mock-infected or infected with HSV-1 (MOI = 10) for 8 h. Cell lysates were collected and pulldown assays were performed using a biotin-labeled ISG54 ISRE probe. The input and probe-bound proteins were analyzed by immunoblotting using an anti-IRF3 polyclonal antibody, and the input samples were also analyzed using an anti-IRF1 monoclonal antibody. (G–K) HT1080 cells stably expressing vector control, IRF1-WT, or IRF1-R82A were mock-infected or infected with VSV (MOI = 5) for 8 h. The expression levels of the indicated genes were quantified by RT-qPCR.

    Journal: Cell Insight

    Article Title: IRF1 amplifies HSV-1-triggered antiviral innate immunity in a feed-forward manner

    doi: 10.1016/j.cellin.2025.100255

    Figure Lengend Snippet: IRF1 promotes antiviral innate immunity through its DNA-binding activity . (A) HEK293T cells were transfected with the indicated plasmids, and WCLs were collected for immunoprecipitation with anti-FLAG affinity agarose. The input and immunoprecipitated samples were analyzed by immunoblotting. (B–E) THP-1 cells stably expressing vector control, IRF1-WT, or IRF1-R82A were mock-infected or infected with HSV-1 (MOI = 5). The indicated genes were quantified by RT-qPCR (B–D), and WCLs were analyzed by immunoblotting at 8 h post-infection (E). (F) THP-1 cells stably expressing vector control, IRF1-WT, or IRF1-R82A were mock-infected or infected with HSV-1 (MOI = 10) for 8 h. Cell lysates were collected and pulldown assays were performed using a biotin-labeled ISG54 ISRE probe. The input and probe-bound proteins were analyzed by immunoblotting using an anti-IRF3 polyclonal antibody, and the input samples were also analyzed using an anti-IRF1 monoclonal antibody. (G–K) HT1080 cells stably expressing vector control, IRF1-WT, or IRF1-R82A were mock-infected or infected with VSV (MOI = 5) for 8 h. The expression levels of the indicated genes were quantified by RT-qPCR.

    Article Snippet: The following antibodies and reagents were used for immunoblotting and immunoprecipitation: Mouse anti-FLAG monoclonal antibody (1:10,000, Dia-An Biotechnology, catalog no. 2064); Mouse anti-HA monoclonal antibody (1:5000, Dia-An Biotechnology, catalog no. 2063); Mouse anti-β-actin monoclonal antibody (1:5000, Dia-An Biotechnology, catalog no. 2060); Mouse anti-GAPDH monoclonal antibody (1:1000, Santa Cruz, sc-47724); Histone H3 antibody (1:1000, Santa Cruz, sc-517576); Rabbit anti-MITA/STING polyclonal antibody (1:5000, Proteintech, catalog no. 19851-1-AP); Rabbit anti-IRF3 polyclonal antibody (1:1000, Proteintech, catalog no. 11312-1-AP); Rabbit anti-TBK1 monoclonal antibody (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, catalog no. 3504); Rabbit anti-phospho-IRF3 (S386) monoclonal antibody (1:1000, Abcam, AB76493); Rabbit anti-phospho-TBK1 (S172) monoclonal antibody (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, catalog no. 5483); Rabbit anti-IRF1 monoclonal antibody (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, catalog no. 8478); Rabbit IgG (Proteintech, catalog no. 20010049); Mouse anti-ICP0 monoclonal antibody (1:1000, Santa Cruz, sc-53070); Mouse anti-ICP8 monoclonal antibody (1:1000, Santa Cruz, sc-53329); Mouse anti-ICP27 monoclonal antibody (1:1000, Santa Cruz, sc-69806); Mouse anti-ICP5 monoclonal antibody (1:1000, Santa Cruz, sc-56989); IRDye 800CW Goat anti-Rabbit and Goat anti-Mouse secondary antibodies (1:10,000, LI-COR); Anti-FLAG beads (Dia-An Biotechnology); Protein A/G agarose (GE healthcare).

    Techniques: Binding Assay, Activity Assay, Transfection, Immunoprecipitation, Western Blot, Stable Transfection, Expressing, Plasmid Preparation, Control, Infection, Quantitative RT-PCR, Labeling